Zoos. What do you think?


Do you think this orangutan is living a good life in the zoo?

We took our grandchildren to the zoo. The orangutans are a popular enclosure to visit because they are very active, swinging on the ropes and bars, climbing the nets, playing with some toys and, as you can see from the above photo, draping themselves with blankets. I like visiting a zoo for the educational factor. The children are able to see animals that they would otherwise only see on tv, or in books. (I do enjoy seeing birds from around the world and the snakes and other animals too.) We have the children’s’ attention and are able to discuss endangered animals and how man has taken over their natural habitat. This being said, part of me  still feels uncomfortable with these caged animals. Is this fair? Is this cruel? They are fed and clean but they are animals, they are snakes and birds and not people.  I know in my heart I think these animals should be free.

What do you think?

Is there value in zoos?

What is the value of a zoo?

Advertisements

23 responses to “Zoos. What do you think?

  1. Zoos are incredibly important. Since we can no longer protect most species in the wild they may be the only way to save them.

  2. Great post, I love visits to the zoo….but I always have a tiny, uncomfortable feeling……..
    Nice blog
    Stacey

  3. Pingback: Are You Listening to the Zoo | Living Life in Glorious Colour

  4. A tough question indeed. Though I do appreciate educational value and conservation efforts of zoo.

  5. I think Zoos can be educational and save a few animals but overall I feel bad for the animals captured and have mixed feelings about viewing them..My grandchildren love to go to the zoo.

  6. A can still picture a huge tiger from my childhood. Pacing and pacing in a 6×20 cage. He must have been going stark raving mad. Miami has a huge “free range” zoo. Such an improvement. I can seen a “I know I am captured” look in the ape’s and monkeys” eyes, however.

    • The Toronto Zoo is one of the best in the world. Ranking either 2nd or 3rd in all the “10 bests” that I have seen. It is over 700 acres and has wonderful programs and great habitats for the animals. They are still limited in range but as far as zoos go, it is world class. I too remember zoos of the past with horrible cages for the animals and I am so happy zoos are now more humane.

  7. They are endanger habitat, so we have to choose what is better for them 🙂

  8. I’ve had the same feelings when going to the zoo. A real mixture of feelings. On one hand I’m trying to educate, on the other, I want to cry for the animals that pace back and forth.
    There are some bigger zoos that offer better environments for the animals. But that takes lots of money…and it leaves the smaller zoos behind.
    Zoos do offer a chance to observe animals that we ordinarily would never see without traveling to exotic countries. And most do a good job of educating our young children with programs they offer.

  9. You raise a difficult question. If a visit to the zoo heightens one’s concern for animals in the wild and what is happening to their habitats then I think it has value beyond sheer entertainment. I agree with the other readers who have mentioned that zoos have improved vastly over time. Also, keep in mind that many of today’s zoo animals were born in captivity and wouldn’t even know how to survive in the wild.

  10. I am conflicted when it comes to zoos. There is the good, the bad and sometimes the ugly side to zoos. I have gone to zoos as well as those other kinds of zoos. I would rather go to a zoo run by the city – much better experience for me and my heart. Thanks for bringing up this topic!

  11. Personally, I am so against caging any healthy, wild animal. It is cruel and a travesty against nature. If there are going to be zoos, then they should be reserved for injured or disabled animals that could not otherwise survive on their own. With today’ technology, animals of all species can easily be observed in books and on film.

    • I agree. With today’s technology, it is now so easy to observe animals on film or online. I no longer see the need to cage otherwise-healthy wild animals just to see them in the flesh. (We’re not allowed to touch them anyway. 🙂 )

      I think technology (along with more accessible travel to places where the animals can be observed in their natural habitat) provides the middle ground between our need to know more about wild animals and their right to live as they were meant and built to live.

  12. Stepping My Way to Bliss

    I am very conflicted about zoos too. On the one hand I love that they provide a closer, personal look to so many animals we may never see otherwise. I love how educational most zoos are nowadays with different programs and creating better enclosures/environments for the animals. And I love how many endangered species have been saved from extinction due to zoos. However, after watching documentaries about wild life and seeing how they really live in the wild, it doesn’t seem fair to see them boxed in and so limited in their habitats–no matter how large it may seem. I remember watching a show that show the migratory paths of a pride of lions over the course of a year…they covered hundreds and hundreds of miles.

  13. The animals live in as close to a natural habitat enviroment as possible with large spaces to roam. The cages are large and are used as places to sleepor in bad weather. They are not like the one above. I like our zoo. You can see some of the pictures I too there here: http://wp.me/p23TG1-4L
    http://wp.me/p23TG1-gd
    http://wp.me/p23TG1-g3

  14. If it’s a good zoo with plenty of room, food and good conditions, then it’s a great way to educate people, and especially kids, about animals.

  15. I’m a big fan of zoos, sanctuaries, and aquariums. Very few of our animals at the San Diego Zoo and the Safari Park are in cages per sé, and those that are have big cages so that they can roam or fly around sufficiently.

    I might have felt differently 50 years ago when everything was in a cage just large enough for it to stand up.

    Most of today’s Zoos and Aquariums are involved in conservation efforts, and the San Diego Zoo has been at the forefront of conservation for about 40 years. It has reintroduced California condors into the wild, rhinoceroses, gray wolves, etc.

    I read Madhu’s comment. Perhaps Earth is our cage in this great Universe!

  16. The picture of the orangutan is so pretty and with vivid colors. And yes he is living a good life, at least he looks like he is.

  17. I enjoy visiting the zoo, and the one we have here in Jerusalem is very beautiful, and it seems to me that the animals are quite comfortable there. I agree, that there is a problem in our directing the lives of other animals… but I think that in many ways, our freedoms too are limited by society, conventions and rules. I liked this picture of the orangutan.

  18. I’ve mixed emotions…a great way to be introduced to animals that would be impossible to see up close otherwise…I totally enjoy the zoo!…but, always walk away with the same question asked…”Is this what was intended for these animals???” …I feel better when I see they are well taken care of…like the orangutan with his blankie…great photos! ~mkg

  19. basically most zoos have come a long way from what they once were. Breeding facilities, environments instead of cages, species preservation, education . It is still a cage in the end but does the animal realize that? sometimes.

  20. Zoos have been around since ancient times (actually more than 2,000 years old, if not older), but they’ve always served a duel purpose of entertainment and education. The Library of Alexandria was one part of a larger museum that included a zoo of exotic animals. Of course today they can also serve a third purpose of conservation.

    I think the issue comes up with the question of whether the entertainment that we get from the animals is contrary to their wellbeing, and whether the education provided outweighs whatever harm may possibly be caused. The idea that animals should be free is a good one, but how free do they need to be for it to be said there’s no harm caused? If an enclosure is large enough they would still technically not be free, but would they still be harmed or stressed by it? You could also look at other aspects of their quality of life, such as how well fed are they compared to wild counterparts and what is their life expectancy in a zoo versus the wild. Some animals have an average life expectancy in the wild of just 2-4 years, but in captivity may live 15-20 years thanks to improved and steady food, medical care, and a safe environment.

    I can’t say I completely like the idea of animals kept in zoos, especially since some aren’t as good as others and not all animals have an enclosure that’s nearly large enough, just that there’s so many beneficial things that zoos offer that I can’t be against them either.

  21. Trying to imagine the reverse. The Orangutan and her kids as the higher species and me inside that cage………not cool!

Please Leave a Reply, I would love to hear from you

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s